Comments on: Bad timing for Samsung and Fuji http://photorumors.com/2010/07/21/bad-timing-for-samsung-and-fuji/ Photography news, before it happens Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:07:12 +0000 hourly 1 By: johnhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/21/bad-timing-for-samsung-and-fuji/comment-page-1/#comment-8588 john Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:52:51 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5089#comment-8588 Whoah! You're absolutely right, those images are fugly at 100% crop. Probably okay when downresing to for web, but still. N-A-S-T-Y!!! Whoah! You’re absolutely right, those images are fugly at 100% crop. Probably okay when downresing to for web, but still. N-A-S-T-Y!!!

]]> By: PR adminhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/21/bad-timing-for-samsung-and-fuji/comment-page-1/#comment-8577 PR admin Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:00:58 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5089#comment-8577 because everyone concentrated their attention on the LX5 because everyone concentrated their attention on the LX5

]]> By: hellohttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/21/bad-timing-for-samsung-and-fuji/comment-page-1/#comment-8576 hello Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:13:17 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5089#comment-8576 Photos are really poor from one of this new Panasonic cameras. http://optyczne.pl/3119-nowo%C5%9B%C4%87-Panasonic_Lumix_DMC-FZ100_-_pierwsze_zdj%C4%99cia.htmlLook at iso 100... shame! Photos are really poor from one of this new Panasonic cameras. http://optyczne.pl/3119-nowo%C5%9B%C4%87-Panasonic_Lumix_DMC-FZ100_-_pierwsze_zdj%C4%99cia.html

Look at iso 100… shame!

]]> By: camamanhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/21/bad-timing-for-samsung-and-fuji/comment-page-1/#comment-8575 camaman Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:55:33 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5089#comment-8575 I don't see how this is timing for Samsung. All of these cameras are consumer oriented and cant be bought today. Most of the target market will go: oh look at those nice dual LCD cameras from Samsung. They are so cool vs those lame black expensive ordinary Panasonics...hahaha :-) :-P I don’t see how this is timing for Samsung.
All of these cameras are consumer oriented and cant be bought today.
Most of the target market will go: oh look at those nice dual LCD cameras from Samsung. They are so cool vs those lame black expensive ordinary Panasonics…

hahaha :-) :-P

]]> By: Rayhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/21/bad-timing-for-samsung-and-fuji/comment-page-1/#comment-8572 Ray Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:01:07 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5089#comment-8572 panasonic stabbed them first. lol panasonic stabbed them first. lol

]]> By: Inge-M.http://photorumors.com/2010/07/21/bad-timing-for-samsung-and-fuji/comment-page-1/#comment-8571 Inge-M. Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:28:05 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5089#comment-8571 Typical, Facebook camra :-) Typical, Facebook camra :-)

]]> By: Eric Pepinhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/21/bad-timing-for-samsung-and-fuji/comment-page-1/#comment-8568 Eric Pepin Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:57:21 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5089#comment-8568 dual screens get a love of love at the camera store, they are a good feature. dual screens get a love of love at the camera store, they are a good feature.

]]> By: MKhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/21/bad-timing-for-samsung-and-fuji/comment-page-1/#comment-8567 MK Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:48:37 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5089#comment-8567 hahaha - the ladies love the self-portrait. if you love ladies, then by association, YOU love self portrait hahaha – the ladies love the self-portrait. if you love ladies, then by association, YOU love self portrait

]]> By: kaihttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/21/bad-timing-for-samsung-and-fuji/comment-page-1/#comment-8566 kai Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:16:09 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5089#comment-8566 well, front LCD might be useful for female self-potrait. it is benificial to them. well, front LCD might be useful for female self-potrait. it is benificial to them.

]]> By: King Of Swazilandhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/21/bad-timing-for-samsung-and-fuji/comment-page-1/#comment-8565 King Of Swaziland Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:04:19 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5089#comment-8565 <I> ... sigh
…
sigh

]]> By: MKhttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/21/bad-timing-for-samsung-and-fuji/comment-page-1/#comment-8564 MK Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:40:37 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5089#comment-8564 LOL +++1 anonymouswho cares? the big question.... the sad answer? probably no one. bad timing on announcement, but regardless cameras with dual screens and projectors are gimmicks. the purpose of the camera is to render and image, using a sensor. if i wanted a projector, id buy... a projector. likewise with dual screens. personally, i don't care about the products, but these companies' development teams should really focus on image quality.release the nx100 already samsung. nx5 release was a snooze fest. LOL +++1 anonymous

who cares? the big question…. the sad answer? probably no one. bad timing on announcement, but regardless cameras with dual screens and projectors are gimmicks. the purpose of the camera is to render and image, using a sensor. if i wanted a projector, id buy… a projector. likewise with dual screens. personally, i don’t care about the products, but these companies’ development teams should really focus on image quality.

release the nx100 already samsung. nx5 release was a snooze fest.

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://photorumors.com/2010/07/21/bad-timing-for-samsung-and-fuji/comment-page-1/#comment-8563 Anonymous Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:46:34 +0000 http://photorumors.com/?p=5089#comment-8563 nobody cares, until we'll see some real sensor improvment - deeper colors & medium format dynamic range. I am sick of waiting 10 years for this. Since the Digital sensors are out the only improvments are MP & noise reduction. nobody cares, until we’ll see some real sensor improvment – deeper colors & medium format dynamic range.
I am sick of waiting 10 years for this. Since the Digital sensors are out the only improvments are MP & noise reduction.

]]>