Coming next: Irix 45mm f/1.4 lens, Irix ILA-FE2EF adapter for Sony, Irix Edge filters

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
Another Irix post - in addition to the new 11mm f/4 lens, at Photokina the company also showed a 45mm f/1.4 lens prototype, ILA-FE2EF lens adapter for Sony cameras and new line of Irix Edge filters:

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
Irix also showed a ILA-FE2EF lens adapter for Sony cameras:

irix-ila-fe2ef-lens-adapter-for-sony-cameras5 OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
Irix is also planning to release new line of filters:

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
Via Optyczne

This entry was posted in Irix and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
  • TinusVerdino

    Huge. Is this for dslr or mirrorless? (the 45 1.4)

    • DSLR

      • TinusVerdino

        82mm filter thread, only 4 less than the new Sigma 85 1.4 art. The tamron 45 1.8 with AF and VC has 67mm. Samyang 50 1.4 77mm. Pentax FA 50mm 1.4 49mm. It is too big. Maybe for shooting on a tripod with a 5dsr, but no sane photographer would use this as a walkaround.

        • vriesk

          Indeed, looks way more bulky than the already ridiculous Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art.

    • I think all of their lenses are for DSLR – that’s why they now introduce an adapter for mirrorless.

    • Mistral75

      May be this lens uses a retrofocus optical formula like Zeiss Otus Apo Distagon T* 55mm f/1.4 ZE/ZF.2.

  • TinusVerdino

    The Formula was co-developed with Zeiss in the early sixties, but it is still a very good lens. On full frame it will do better than aps-c as it was designed for that. If you wand boring perfection just stop down a bit, it will deliver just as well as most modern 50’s.

    • Why should it be any better on 36MP FF when the 10MP APS-C sensor is basically just a center crop of a much lower pixel density (~23MP) FF sensor? That, and the Pentax was just another of the “classic” Double Gauss lenses (a 7/6 I believe). Nobody denies that they’re all pretty good at f/5.6 but at f/1.4… not so much. Even if the corners would recover magically on FF (but why would they), you’d still be left with a huge midzone deep. Photozone also cites low contrast.

  • Back to top