Worst camera of the year (2013)

Worst-cameras-of-the-year-award-2013
Scroll down for the latest posts, click to vote.

Several websites are doing the best camera of the year awards, which is kind of getting boring. That's why this year I am introducing the first Worst Camera of the Year Award. I will keep this post pinned on top till the end of the year and then I will announce the winner (loser). Please vote and spread the word. Here are the nominees in a random order :


Leica X Vario ($2,850): a "mini M" was this not.


Hasselblad Stellar (unknown price): because the Lunar was not bad enough?


Pentax Q7 ($496.95): who is buying those?


Canon PowerShot N ($255): a camera with Facebook integration, would be great if we did not have smartphones.


Fujifilm X-A1 ($499): the X line is great, but don't we have enough models already?


Nikon 1 S1 ($279+): I think this was a joke.


Olympus Stylus 1 ($699): the OM-D is a great camera, but why make a mini-OM-D and sell it for $700?


Panasonic Lumix FZ70 ($279): with 20-1200mm lens - the only reason this camera exists is to show that 60x zoom compact is possible.


Samsung Galaxy Camera ($1,699): is it a camera or a tablet?


Sony Cybershot QX100 ($498): a self contain lens-camera module - a solution to a non-existing problem.

Here is the poll:


Worst camera of the year (2013)

Exit mobile version