Sony A850 will be full frame

Sony A850 keeps leaking. After the appearance on Sony's product registration page, the Sony A850 DSLR manual popped up on Hong Kong support site. Here are the scans - click on image for larger view (full PDF file available here):

sony a 850 manual front 1249154964 300x191 Sony A850 will be full frame picture 7 196x300 Sony A850 will be full frame picture 8 206x300 Sony A850 will be full frame picture 9 213x300 Sony A850 will be full frame picture 10 207x300 Sony A850 will be full frame picture 11 205x300 Sony A850 will be full frame picture 12 206x300 Sony A850 will be full frame

Via Engadget

Related posts:

  1. Sony keeps leaking – now we also have A750, A850, A950
  2. Sony a500, a550, a850 DSLR cameras leaked on Sony website
  3. Sony A850 worldwide launch date rumor
  4. 32MP full frame Sony a920 DSLR camera in August?
  5. Sony a290, a390 and a850 DSLR cameras to be discontinued

This entry was posted in Sony and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

25 Comments

  1. NikoDoby
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 12:44 am | Permalink

    So this is gonna be a step down from the 900? Or a step up? If it’s at or below a Nikon D700 price range then I’m seriously gonna be paying attention to this one.

    • Posted August 2, 2009 at 12:48 am | Permalink

      the rumor is that this will be a sub $2000 camera

  2. NikoDoby
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 12:51 am | Permalink

    Oops, my bad, i meant Nikon D300S

  3. NikoDoby
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 1:00 am | Permalink

    Obviously Sony “leaked” this to steal the “thunder” from Nikon’s D300S announcement. Nikon knew this so they announce the D300S first, then let Sony show off the A350. It’s all a chess game.

    But this is great news because maybe a D400/D500 will have the same 24mp full-frame sensor!!! Or the D700X will come out real soon with 24mp AND video !!!

  4. rawr
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 1:06 am | Permalink

    unless this is a really cheap camera, there really is nothing redeeming to this camera. if this is the true successor to the alpha 700, then im done with sony. its seems as if they ignored all the desires of its photographers and came up something recycled.

    • NikoDoby
      Posted August 2, 2009 at 1:26 am | Permalink

      I don’t get it rawr? A $1999US FULL FRAME camera is a bad thing?

      • Posted August 2, 2009 at 6:57 am | Permalink

        This is HUGE!

        If they can offer this at a price point comfortably below $2000, it would be a groundbreaking announcement. Looking at the predicted specs (basically A900 with slower FPS and smaller viewfinder) it becomes a D300S + Cannon 60D killer.)

        While “perks” like live view and video are nice, they are not needed – especially at that price point with THAT sensor.

        • Sproutey
          Posted August 2, 2009 at 9:26 am | Permalink

          Why is it huge?
          FF remains a tiny niche product with a total single-figure percentage market share. To say this will kill the D300s and 60D when both those cameras will absolutely destroy this one on specification and still offer killer IQ is patently ridiculous.
          A complete non-event when Sony have no true prosumer spec APS-C camera to fight the big two.
          FF is simply not a huge deal outside of the minority of vocal internet fans at this end of the market.

          • Posted August 2, 2009 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

            FF is only a niche product because of the price, just like HDTV was a niche product 5 years ago.

            The reason this is huge is that it will allow the advanced amateur to purchase a FF camera for APS-C dollars.

            If indeed Sony is planning on launching this at the much discussed price point, that minority market share that you speak of will rapidly advance (which is of course why it is rumored that Canon is also preparing to launch an affordable FF camera.)

            As for IQ, head over to Dxomark and take a look at the A900.

        • Anonymous
          Posted August 3, 2009 at 2:59 am | Permalink

          In my opinion it comes down to it’s noise habits. While 24mp are sure something nice to have, there is only a very small circle of people that really NEED 24mp. Though if the noise levels aren’t any better, which I’ll doubt, I think most of the people will still choose a APS-C camera with killer fps, superb handling and an autofocus system that is the best in town. This is why I don’t think that it will make a D300/s/400 loose much of it’s share.
          But the good thing about it, is that it will certainly have an impact on prices, Nikon and Canon will be forced to drop their prices as well, as they are, especially at Nikon, ridiculously high for FX/FF.

          • Posted August 3, 2009 at 8:47 am | Permalink

            Kind of like, no one will ever need more than 640K of ram? ;)

          • Anonymous
            Posted August 3, 2009 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

            @survivor
            I think this this not the right comparison you’re making
            In my opinion 98%of all commercially used images don’t use more than 3mp. Though the NEED for 24 is really little.
            Here we just have limits, and those limits are our eyes. You can print a 12mp pictures at a size where it is more than most poeüle actually want it. Though, we a a physical limit to what we need, because ours eyes “can’t see more”.

          • Posted August 3, 2009 at 6:39 pm | Permalink

            I think you are missing the fact that being full frame means even though the MP count is going up vs. APS-C, the pixel density is going down – which is of course why there are 60 MP Medium format cameras (i.e. you need to increase the MP count to fill the frame and maintain the density.)

    • Sky
      Posted August 3, 2009 at 10:52 am | Permalink

      it’ll be cheaper A900, not successor of A700 – successor of A700 will be (already rumored) A750.

  5. tk
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 2:02 am | Permalink

    i would consider this if the price point is below 2k( lets say 1.8k ).

  6. T3
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 6:27 am | Permalink

    I would hope $1800 only body…

    How much will be the D700x??

  7. gurbally
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 10:31 am | Permalink

    I will now definitely conside Sony because it now has superb Carl Zeiss lenses like 16-35mm 2.8, 85mm 1.4 and 135mm 1.8. Sony are a much much bigger company than Canon and Nikon and they are very serious about capturing the DSLR market.

  8. gurbally
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    Sony’s 135mm 1.8 is unsurpassed.

  9. Rebel
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    I don’t understand Sony …this A850 is identical to the Alpha 900!! As 230/330/380 are identical to the old models !!

    • Sky
      Posted August 3, 2009 at 10:53 am | Permalink

      yep, you don’t understand sony.
      A230/230/380 are cams for people upgrading from point and shoot.
      A850 is cheaper A900 – different speed, differend viewfinder, and so on…

  10. T3
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    Rebel you can buy a a900 for $2500 and I am almost sure that you will can a a850 for $1800 with a little bit difference….

  11. Rebel
    Posted August 2, 2009 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    I can buy an Alpha 900 for about 2000€, I hope the new FF A850 will cost 1500€… like a Nikon D300s!
    But if this will be true I think there cannot be that many photographers who will opt for an A900: so the A900 will ”die”…

  12. bibbles
    Posted August 3, 2009 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    we’re not going to see a $1999 24MP camera. sorry.

  13. ogata
    Posted August 3, 2009 at 9:47 pm | Permalink

    no one doubts that the pdf is just a fake made from the a900 manual?

    • Posted August 3, 2009 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

      It was on the Sony website. They are not known for spoofing manuals on their support site…