New redesigend Zeiss Distagon ZF 1.4/35 with floating element

By PR admin | Published: September 30, 2009

In his Leica M9 & Nikon D3x comparisson Erwin Puts wrote:

"Lenses used are the Summilux-M 1.4/35mm asph and a very new redesigend Zeiss Distagon 1.4/35 with Floating element."

This sentence was removed after it appeared on FredMiranda forum.

Related posts:

  1. Zeiss Distagon ZF 1.4/35 ZF.2 to be official in few weeks
  2. Rumor: New Zeiss Distagon 25mm f/2.0 lens coming in October
  3. Zeiss to announce the new Distagon T* 1,4/35 ZE/ZF.2 lens on Wednesday
  4. New Zeiss 25mm f/2 Distagon lens is coming
  5. Rumor: also a new Zeiss Distagon 16mm f/2.8 lens

This entry was posted in Zeiss. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

6 Comments

  1. zeeGerman
    Posted September 30, 2009 at 9:50 am | Permalink

    I wish they would add AF to their ZF series. Otherwise they are fantastic.

    • Adam
      Posted September 30, 2009 at 10:50 am | Permalink

      yeah, I agree, but why are they not adding AF? It will surely bring more buyer if they do =.=

      • zeeGerman
        Posted September 30, 2009 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

        Not sure, but maybe their deal with Sony denies them to produce AF lenses for any other system. They are a long time lens supplier for Sonys cameras, and have a good range of AF lenses, prime and zoom, for the Sony SLR line.

        • dyna
          Posted October 1, 2009 at 1:00 am | Permalink

          This is, for all intents and purposes, correct. Sony essentially has exclusivity on AF designs for DSLR or other large sensor still cameras. For now.

          • Sky
            Posted October 1, 2009 at 6:55 am | Permalink

            Yep, that’s true.

    • Nj
      Posted October 2, 2009 at 4:25 am | Permalink

      What for? AF is for sports stuff. I’ve used it just once on my 5D2 (for a snapshot of a cat *g*). It’s far too unreliable and causes lack of control. Get an Eg-S screen for the 5D2.. and contact lenses if this is isn’t more accurate than AF at least 90% of the time.