Hasselblad H4D-40 presentation

By PR admin | Published: February 12, 2010

A detailed hands-on with the new Hasselblad H4D-40 is available @ ThePhoblographer (also a sample photo).

Here is the official video from Hasselblad:

More detailed videos from each of the featured photographers after the break:

Related posts:

  1. Hasselblad H4D-40 update
  2. The price of the new Hasselblad H4D-40 is…
  3. New Hasselblad products at Photokina
  4. New Hasselblad H4X body coming soon
  5. Hasselblad teaser (this time in English)

This entry was posted in Hasselblad and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

9 Comments

  1. tibor
    Posted February 12, 2010 at 3:07 pm | Permalink

    I need a MiniBlad with 30x30mm sensor, using Dslr lenses , 25MP, iso 25-6400, 2000$. I’d buy it now !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. sushistand
    Posted February 12, 2010 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    Nothing here a D3X can do.

    Talk about diminishing gains.

    Move along..

  3. grumps
    Posted February 13, 2010 at 12:20 pm | Permalink

    This is interesting, Hassy CEO or whatever talked down at the Leica S2, and now produces this, I really don’t find this better in design to the S2 except maybe offering more MPs. The bulk that you carry is shrouded by marketing hype, bring in very respectful photogs and you think the camera is better and sells, sure hassys are good, but come on, after the talk down and seeing the H4D, this is all hype and substance is “just” another Had! Loyalists may buy, but I’m gonna say it… “Where’s the HD video in this?” (kidding)
    Price wise, you come to expect this with MF cameras, but I see the prices converging and the technology growing, so in no time, Canons and Nikon will superceed this!

    • Eric Pepin
      Posted February 13, 2010 at 9:56 pm | Permalink

      A bigger sensor will always be better, its physics m8

      • tibor
        Posted February 14, 2010 at 12:11 am | Permalink

        yes but it will also need bigger lenses, & so, very expensive lenses that have to be at the top of the technology.

      • grumps
        Posted February 14, 2010 at 3:11 am | Permalink

        ….what’s your point, relative to what I said?

      • Anonymous
        Posted February 15, 2010 at 4:51 am | Permalink

        Better but not the manner you were thinking. It’s the pixel size not the sensor size that you’re thinking. Sensor size does contribute to shallow depth of field. That is the medium format look. It’s all dof and software. Really little to do with the “superiority” of their sensors, given the fact Nikon has superior technology in their sensors.

  4. camaman
    Posted February 14, 2010 at 10:57 am | Permalink

    Well I was really hoping for a full res sample pic! :(
    Anyone got a link to one?
    Or at least from a previous model…

  5. Anonymous
    Posted February 15, 2010 at 5:02 am | Permalink

    True Focus. lol. Still technically inferior to the lowest 35mm dslr.