Pentax 645D – is this the final version?

Two pictures of Pentax 645D courtesy of Pentax Japan - this is probably the final version that will be revealed on the teaser ad (click for larger view):

pentax 645d front 590x484 Pentax 645D   is this the final version?

pentax 645d back 590x437 Pentax 645D   is this the final version?

As you can see the back picture is slightly different from the one I published yesterday more buttons, different side cover.

How do I know this will be the final version? Take a look at this picture.

Related posts:

  1. Pentax K7 final version will have a modified sensor
  2. More on the “Pentax 645D coming to Europe” news
  3. New Apple Final Cut Pro to be announced on April 12?
  4. Pentax 645D is revealing itself slowly
  5. Pentax 645D red limited edition camera now shipping in the US, the Silver K-5 coming soon

This entry was posted in Pentax and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

33 Comments

  1. NikoDoby
    Posted February 16, 2010 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    So is it 35 mega pixels?

  2. Anonymous
    Posted February 16, 2010 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    And at $6500? Hmm……

    Now do I go for this or keep buying Nikon gear?

    • Posted February 16, 2010 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

      Where did you see this price? very very very tempting (Nikon D700 User).

    • ennan
      Posted February 17, 2010 at 6:11 am | Permalink

      As nice as this sounds I think Nikon have the better system overall so I personally wouldn’t get rid of my Nikon gear. I also think the current full frame nikons are more versatile… Guess we’ll have to see what the image quality is like.

      • Sky
        Posted February 17, 2010 at 7:57 am | Permalink

        I’ll leave the Nikon in dust for sure. Even if it’d have poor, old sensor – it still would be better than any current Nikon.
        I mean… c’mon – it’s Medium Format with all it’s advantages!

      • SZRimaging
        Posted February 17, 2010 at 11:28 am | Permalink

        The small format gear has it purpose, and I wouldn’t abandon it. But, for portraits and certain commercial work, this would beat the pants of a D3x. And I, for some odd reason, want a native ISO of 100 or 80….

  3. John
    Posted February 16, 2010 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

    In the front picture that top button (maybe mirror lock up) in the groove on the top is not shown on the Teaser website – so maybe slightly different button layout at least on the front of the camera

  4. K. Artur
    Posted February 16, 2010 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

    Looks great. Quality work. Now, any news on the lenses?

    • SZRimaging
      Posted February 16, 2010 at 5:35 pm | Permalink

      Or at least the mount?

      • Mistral75
        Posted February 17, 2010 at 7:31 am | Permalink

        Pentax 645 mount I presume. I do not see why they would change the mount.

  5. BH
    Posted February 16, 2010 at 5:55 pm | Permalink

    and I wouldnt just buy an M9 Why? is it really going to be able to compare to a hasselblad or mamiya?

  6. leicamonster
    Posted February 16, 2010 at 7:15 pm | Permalink

    but the m9 is small and compact, i holding off getting the leica s2 til this some out.

    • BH
      Posted February 16, 2010 at 7:22 pm | Permalink

      idk doesnt seem like that should be something to ponder…leica or pentax…..

      • Posted February 16, 2010 at 7:42 pm | Permalink

        i know but $23000 for leica body only, i could get a 1ds IV 36mp ( soon ) or pentax 645d and almost all the lenses for the same price.

    • Eric Pepin
      Posted February 16, 2010 at 11:59 pm | Permalink

      um no offense but pentax and the leica S2 dont compare at all and it makes no sense to compare them. Hassy , or phase one are actual comparisons. This pentax might be awesome, but it wont be a match for the leica.

      • Posted February 17, 2010 at 1:22 am | Permalink

        really? based on what?

        I knew that Leica fanboys are pretty hardcore and more then often unreasonable but that much?

        • Global
          Posted February 17, 2010 at 3:58 am | Permalink

          He means it won’t be a match for the price.

          Yeah! Leica has everyone beat. lol..

      • Posted February 17, 2010 at 2:09 am | Permalink

        thats why i want to wait, i use the s2 already but not worth the price.
        you never know how its going to be til its out.

  7. Peter
    Posted February 16, 2010 at 7:27 pm | Permalink

    This looks amazing…

  8. Posted February 17, 2010 at 1:19 am | Permalink

    and tripod mount for portrait mode, yummy! Something Nikon or canon was never able to do.

  9. photog.de
    Posted February 17, 2010 at 3:54 am | Permalink

    The pictures show a design-study from 2009, not the final version. ->

  10. vincent
    Posted February 17, 2010 at 5:38 am | Permalink

    hope to see iso 102,400

    • Mistral75
      Posted February 17, 2010 at 7:38 am | Permalink

      Hmm… The brand new Hasselblad H4D-40 with micro-lenses on the sensor is able to deliver superb pictures at ISO 400, very good ones at ISO 800 and usable ones at ISO 1,600 and this is quite an achievement in the MF world.

    • Sky
      Posted February 17, 2010 at 8:03 am | Permalink

      not a chance vincent. It’s not a camera for home photography – it’s STUDIO camera, where you have unlimited light, perhaps also for good-weather outdoor photography, but still it’s not for reporters who need high ISO.
      That kind of hopes is what make people disappointed when they have all the reasons to be uber-happy. See Alpha 900 as an example. “High Iso” they say, “bad JPGs” they say – but if someone buys A900 he doesn’t care about anything else than ISO 100 and RAW.

  11. Vladimir
    Posted February 17, 2010 at 8:28 am | Permalink

    Isn’t it the very first prototype? I’m almost sure that I’ve seen exactly this version 1.5 years ago…

  12. Mark
    Posted February 17, 2010 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    I’m still set on the p25+ back with its larger sensor (49x37mm) and relatively low price. It only has 22MP, but I assume if you’re going for MF, you’re doing it for the format, not pixels or high ISO performance.

    If you want to settle for 44x33mm, there’s plenty of used H2D-31 & H3D-31′s for similar prices.

  13. Sigfried
    Posted February 17, 2010 at 6:21 pm | Permalink

    Is anyone able to read labels on the lens? I’m not sure if it’s been talked or not, but what about the lens? I mean the system – the current range (DA) is designed to fit crops only and I’m not able to find any announcements saying that Pentax is going to bring to lenses.

    Although I’m not that big MF (645, 6×7) boy, probably if those old midframe lens are still in production and they fit this 645D then there shouldn’t be any mess on this at all.

    Yours,
    Zig

    P.S.
    fingers x’d :) )

  14. sflxn
    Posted February 17, 2010 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    If significantly more than $6500, then this is great marketing. Keep us watching, anticipating unprecedented prices, then lower the pricing boom.