New Samsung NX 20-50mm f/3.5-5.6 compact zoom lens

Samsung will announce a new 20-50mm f/3.5-5.6 (non-OIS) compact zoom lens for the NX series - this was already mentioned during PMA, but now we also have a picture:
samsung nx 20 50mm lens New Samsung NX 20 50mm f/3.5 5.6 compact zoom lens
Size: 51x59mm
Weight: 164gr
The exact date of announcement was given.

Related posts:

  1. Olympus XZ-1 compact camera with a fast f/1.8 Zuiko zoom lens
  2. In the mean time Samsung quietly tries to release another super zoom (WB 5000)
  3. Samsung NX10 shown in Korea, no GX30 for now
  4. Sigma 50mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro lens patent
  5. Samsung’s patent for a liquid zoom lens

This entry was posted in Samsung and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

12 Comments

  1. Kevin
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 12:26 am | Permalink

    Who needs this lens?

  2. Jonathan
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 3:00 am | Permalink

    If it was almost as small as a pancake then yes – but as it is it doesn’t make any sense.

    We want a fast f/2.8 zoom Samsung!! Or at least more fast prime pancakes. Take a hint from Pentax!

  3. Sylwiusz
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 4:47 am | Permalink

    ROTFL, it is neither small nor light. Here is full frame Pentax lens with wider zoom range, built for FF (yes, full frame – 36×24 mm) DSLR (so it should be much bigger and heavier than lens for mirrorless camera with 2,2 x smaller sensor):
    http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/zooms/short/FAJ28-80f3.5-5.6.html
    No comments :-/ Samsung should learn a lot, right now I can almost no gains of using their mirrorles system :-/

  4. henrik
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 7:03 am | Permalink

    This one doesn’t exactly tickle my fancy either

  5. Din
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 8:08 am | Permalink

    This could be a nice lens for a small and compact a NX camera.
    The actual 18-55mm kit lens is:
    -63mm x 65.1mm (W x L)
    -198gr (W)

    That lens look small and 30-75mm (APS-C) can be nice…

  6. Eric
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 11:05 am | Permalink

    I really don’t understand zooms like this (or 35-70mm zooms back in the film days). People would be much better off just using the Samsung 30mm pancake and you know, move their feet when they need to zoom. Not only is the 30mm much smaller it also gives DOF control…something no f/3.5-5.6 standard zoom can give you.

  7. Din
    Posted March 26, 2010 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    This lens is 12mm smaller and 6mm thinner than 18-55 ois kit and almost 30gr lighter. For a APS-C camera look good for me and 30-75mm is useful no too much difference to 28mm.

  8. Kevin
    Posted March 27, 2010 at 12:03 am | Permalink

    It has all the appearances of being a sub-kit lens, rather than a compact/lightweight alternative. Now, if it collapsed into itself like the Olympus E-P1′s kit lens, that would be worthwhile. If it afforded a faster aperture than a standard kit lens, say 3.5-4.5, or something more ambitious, than it would have greater attraction still. As it is, the lens offers token decreases in size and weight, and no OIS.

    Yet to be seen are its distortion characteristics, which I suspect will be greatly improved over the more “ambitious” kit offerings. Perhaps it will be enough to justify its existence.

  9. Din
    Posted March 27, 2010 at 9:21 am | Permalink

    Samsung 20-50mm (30-75mm)
    51mm x 59mm (W x H)
    164gr

    Olympus 14-42 (28-84mm)
    62mm x 43mm (W x H)
    150gr

    Panasonic 14-45 (28-90mm)
    60mm x 60mm (W x H)
    195gr

    Almost the same Panasonic focal and a little bit smaller and lighter for a APS-C zoom lens.

  10. tlong
    Posted March 27, 2010 at 10:25 am | Permalink

    I suspect this lens isn’t the 20-50mm which is supposed to come out later this year but the 18-55mm non-OIS variant, a kit lens for NX5.

  11. Posted March 28, 2010 at 8:27 pm | Permalink

    f5.6 at 50mm? Wow, that’s some impressive feast of optical engineering.

  12. Greenwood_Geoff
    Posted March 29, 2010 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    20-50mm f/3.5-5.6 LOL ….. 3.5 to 5.6 in this short range ? It better not cost more than a couple hundred and even at that I would not be interested