Sigma announced several new products including a 46MP camera with Foveon X3 sensor

Update: the official Sigma SD1 website is up.

 Sigma announced several new products including a 46MP camera with Foveon X3 sensor

The Sigma Corporation is pleased to announce the new SIGMA SD1 Digital SLR Camera, incorporating a 46 megapixel (4,800×3,200×3 layers) 24×16mm APS-C X3 direct image sensor.

The SIGMA SD1 is Sigma's flagship digital SLR model, adopting a lightweight yet solid magnesium alloy for its body and O-ring sealing connections to make a weather-resistant design throughout for use in harsh conditions.

The SIGMA SD1 incorporates a 24×16mm APS-C X3 direct image sensor and dual “TRUE (Three-layer Responsive Ultimate Engine) II ”image processing engines. The combination of the 46 megapixel (4,800×3,200×3 layers) sensor and dual TRUE II processing engines ensure the high resolution images are processed quickly with high definition and a smooth and subtle graduation of color.

The SD1 is SIGMA’s latest digital SLR camera which meets high requirements of professional and enthusiast photographers for all types of photography.

This product is showcased at Photokina 2010 in Koln, Germany.

SIGMA SD1 Product Summary

46 megapixel 24×16mm APS-C X3 Full-color image sensor
The 46 megapixel (4,800×3,200×3 layers) 24×16mm APS-C X3 direct image sensor featured in the Sigma SD1 captures all primary RGB colors at each and every pixel location, ensuring the capture of full and complete color. Using three silicon-embedded layers of photo detectors, stacked vertically to take advantage of silicon’s ability to absorb red, green and blue light at different respective depths, it efficiently reproduces color more accurately, and offers sharper resolution, pixel for pixel, than any conventional image sensor. Since color moire is not generated, the use of a low-pass filter is not required, meaning light and color, generated by the 46 megapixel APS-C X3 direct image sensor is captured with a three-dimensional feel.

Dual TRUE II image processing engine
The SD1 incorporates a dual “TRUE (Three-layer Responsive Ultimate Engine) II” image processing engine which improves the processing speed and overall quality of the final image. The unique image-processing algorithm provides high resolution power and reproduces high definition images with richly graduated tones.

CF card
The SD1 adopts the TYPE I CF Card. This camera is compatible with the UDMA enabling fast processing of large amounts of data.
* It is not possible to use Microdrives and TYPE II CF cards.

11 point twin cross sensor
The autofocus system features an 11 point twin cross sensor. The shifted twin cross type sensor improves AF accuracy.

Magnesium body
The Sigma SD1 adopts a lightweight yet solid magnesium alloy body designed to withstand rough use and shocks in harsh conditions.

Weather-resistant design
Buttons and connections benefit from O-ring sealing connections to prevent dust and water getting inside the camera body.

Large, highly visible 3.0” TFT color LCD Monitor
The SD1 camera features a 3.0 inch TFT color monitor. This 460,000 pixel resolution LCD monitor benefits from a wide viewing angle, making it easy to check focusing and composition.

Optional lenses
The SD1 can be used with over 40 Sigma lenses such as ultra-wide, ultra-telephoto, macro and fisheyes which adopt the latest technology such as the FLD (“F” Low Dispersion) glass elements, which have the performance equal to fluorite glass, SLD glass, Aspherical lenses, Sigma's own unique Optical Stabilizer function, Hyper Sonic Motor and Sigma's Super Multi Layer Coating. They meet the various and demanding requirements of all types of photographers.

FormatInterchangeable lens SLR camera
Storage MediaCompact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Image Sensor Size24×16mm
Lens MountSIGMA SA bayonet mount
Compatible LensesSIGMA SA mount interchangeable lenses
Angle of ViewEquivalent to approx. 1.5 times the focal length of the lens (for 35mm cameras)
Image SensorX3 direct image sensor (CMOS)
Effective Pixels46MP (4,800×3,200×3 layers)
Aspect Ratio3 : 2
Viewfinder TypPentaprism SLR viewfinder
Viewfinder Frame Coverage98% vertical, 98% horizontal
Viewfinder Magnification0.95x (50mmF1.4 - ∞)
Eye point18mm
Diopter Adjustment Range-3.0 dpt - +1.5 dpt
Auto Focus TypeTTL phase difference detection system
AF Point11 points twin cross sensor
AF Operating RangeEV -2 to +19 (ISO100)
Focus ModeSingle AF, Continuous AF (with AF motion prediction function), Manual
Focusing ScreenFixed, all matt screen
MirrorQuick return
Depth of Field PreviewDepth of field preview button
AF Point SelectionAutomatic Selection, Manual Selection
Active AF point indicatorSuperimposed in viewfinder
Focus LockShutter Release Halfway-Down position
Built-in FlashManual Pop-up Built-in flash, GN11 (17mm lens angle covered)
Flash Metering SystemS-TTL Auto Flash
Flash Compensation±3EV (1/3 stop increments)
Compatible FlashgunsEF-610 DG SUPER, EF-610 DG ST, EM-140DG
Sync TerminalAvailable
Flash ConnectivityHot shoe (contact X synchronization at 1/180 sec. or less, with dedicated flash linking contact)
LCD MonitorType : TFT color LCD monitor, Monitor Size : 3.0", LCD Pixels : Approx. 460,000
Dimensions145.5 mm/5.7" (W) × 112.5 mm/4.4"(H) × 80.0 mm/3.1"
WeightTBD
* The appearance and specifications are subject to change without notice.

Related posts:

  1. No word on the 46MP Sigma SD1 camera
  2. Sigma SD1 can do LiveView, full frame Foveon sensor in development?
  3. Guest post: Detailed analysis of the Sigma SD1′s Foveon X3 technology
  4. Sigma MIL camera to be announced in few hours? *updated*
  5. Where is the 46 MP Sigma SD1 DSLR camera?

This entry was posted in Sigma and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

35 Comments

  1. BONETTI
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 3:07 am | Permalink

    Looks Like a Winner!!!

  2. what??
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 3:30 am | Permalink

    WHAT???
    I didn’t see that one comming… wow..
    If it’s good, it is a little revolution!
    Lets hope so.

  3. Posted September 21, 2010 at 3:36 am | Permalink

    flash sync 1/180?
    Why sigma have to kill it already before it starts?

    Sadly this cam will be long forgotten as always before. I would hate to be stuck with just sigma lenses. Sure 48Mpix will attract some mall shoppers, but first after HUGE dump sale rabats (as was always with sigma).

  4. lorenzino
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 3:58 am | Permalink

    It has to be said that foveon “46 mp” is in fact 15.5 mp x 3 layers. Which does not translate into a bayer 46 mp equivalent. Their 14 mp resolved more or less like a 10mp camera (a bit less, in fact). And only in full colors: for b&w foveon is stuck to its basic resolution, in this case 15.5 mp (still good, though).
    Still, this sensor looks very very interesting. Pity the camera is a Sigma, which implies an unlimited series of small problems that will limit its usability (it is not a coincidence that all Sigma users also have other brand dslr).
    Let’s hope that the sensor is good, and that it will be used in future small cameras, à la dp1. Even better would be a Sigma EVIL: something I have been harping from the very day the dp1 was out (long before the appearence of m43 cameras)

  5. Sixbysix
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 4:51 am | Permalink

    It doesn’t matter… Following prior examples from Sigma, anyone interested has 18-24 months to save up before it is released.

  6. BenS
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 5:33 am | Permalink

    Sigma says it is a 46MP (4,800×3,200×3 layers) sensor. Does this mean the largest pictures it takes i really 46 MP in size or is it just 15.3 MP ?

  7. Posted September 21, 2010 at 5:58 am | Permalink

    Does the x3 mean a broader dynamic range is captured?

    • dasdkljasd
      Posted September 21, 2010 at 6:01 am | Permalink

      it means that whatever it means, is not good enough to even raise eyebrows of canon or nikon.

      • Carlos R B
        Posted September 21, 2010 at 7:57 am | Permalink

        Only beacuse Sigma has not a good reputation regarding QC…but if the camera delivers, i bet it will raise eyebrows of pretty much everyone…

        • sflxn
          Posted September 21, 2010 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

          It’s not only QC that Sigma has had trouble with. The Foveon sensor has trouble with some colors. It’s great for super saturated photos you want to post of flickr, but the color problems means it will never be taken seriously in the commercial world. Who knows, maybe they’ve figure out how to solve this issue. The sharpness of their photos are commendable. Too bad, Sigma makes the body.

          • Carlos R B
            Posted September 21, 2010 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

            Its seems that is not the case with the newest SD15…the colors are much more “canon” now…according to sigma users…

  8. totalreader
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 6:38 am | Permalink

    Great news!!!
    what about price?

  9. hh
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 7:40 am | Permalink

    i wanna see more about the lens. i was going to buy the 150mm now i have to wait more to see if this its as good as the older one or not

  10. Carlos R B
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 7:58 am | Permalink

    Awesome if Sigma can make this one without all the lock ups, color tints and everything….but it will cost….a LOT….

    • lorenzino
      Posted September 21, 2010 at 9:41 am | Permalink

      As always with Sigma, one year is enough to see the street-price halved, or less, compared to the original street-price. Problem is that nobody buys sigma, although they have very good ideas, because the quirks in their cameras can create serious problems to any serious user. I’d rather have a pink but working camera than a “seriously black” but quirky one…
      Let’s see how THIS one works…

      • Carlos R B
        Posted September 21, 2010 at 9:54 am | Permalink

        I for one spent a lot of money with Sigma..Sd10(2), SD14 and a bunch of lenses , flash, grip and etc…and of course i had a lot of troubles….but it seems that the new lenses are better optically and we can only hope that the QC is now improved….lets wait and see…..

        • lorenzino
          Posted September 21, 2010 at 5:51 pm | Permalink

          I, for one, wanted to invest some cash on the sd14, when the price collapsed. Then I had a vision, and bought a Nikon D80.
          Recently I had something similar with the ep1smth. Did not buy it. After all, as great as the IQ can be, if you are not able to 1) shoot in low light, 2) use AF, 3) use back screen with average light, 4) use OVF, and the EVF is terrible, 5) save more than one pic without the camera freezing for one minute or more, 6) use IBIS (there is none), 7) change lens (ok, this is inherent to the design of a fixed-lens camera; but still…), 8) shoot proper green, 9) take video (ok, who cares, but still), 10) … did I miss anything?
          Well, as almost all of the above is possible with whatever m43, NX, NEX, etc. cameras, that tend to cost as much as the dpwhatever… well, better to invest in one of the latter ones…
          am I mistaken?

          • lorenzino
            Posted September 21, 2010 at 5:55 pm | Permalink

            btw: I have nothing against Sigma lenses. I have a lot against Sigma cameras. But sure, even if sigma cameras were perfect (huhuhuh!) the only lenses usable are the sigma ones. Which is a severe limit, as all other brands can use all sigmas PLUS their branded ones PLUS all other compatible brands.
            Which means that a e.g. Nikon camera can use gazillions more lenses than a Sigma SD camera, many of which excellent+
            I am not counting lenses usable via adaptor, as AF, VR, etc. would not work (= they lose a lot of their appeal, and sometimes become a PITA)

  11. woble
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 9:30 am | Permalink

    120-300/2.8 with OS is awesome news. I imagine the price will probably be around 2500 Euro. And who knows, the old version might now start dropping in price as well.

  12. Chris P
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    If they haven’t jacked the price up too much from the previous model, and the QC is good, this might tempt me instead of the, hopefully soon to be introduced, updated Nikon 80-400.

  13. Just A Thought
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    No low-pass filter !!
    No Bayer filter.
    Even if the sensor resolution is 15.5 MP, could still make a great Digital B&W camera that no other Bayer type DSLR could come close to – in theory.

  14. Nikki
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 11:02 am | Permalink

    I think Sigma should not try to compete with the big ones in camera making. They should look for a niche. For example: The big ones avoid producing a cheap full format camera cause they want people to first buy DX and then upgrade for a lot of money.

    Sigma could really earn a lot of money here, from people like me, who can live with less than the best in AF and frame rate, but want FX. The features of my D40 are totally fine (except maybe adding U1 and U2 user banks like on D7000), I just want a large image sensor. This is what Sigma should provide.

    • lorenzino
      Posted September 21, 2010 at 5:57 pm | Permalink

      Nikon D40 works better than any Sigma sd camera. Only thing sigma has better is the sensor (which is a lot, actually). But I heard horrible stories about pics people were not able to take, thanks to the quirks of the sd14…

  15. Amien
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 11:13 am | Permalink

    A dream camera but 2 questions :

    Why no Full Frame ?
    What about noise & iso ?

    • lorenzino
      Posted September 21, 2010 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

      1) because it costs a lot, and sigma-foveon cannot make it at the moment

      2)in the sd 14-15 world high iso /noise was a big problem. Let’s hope the new sensor solved it…

  16. China_Mike
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 11:15 am | Permalink

    The 120-300 2.8 OS looks like a serious winner. Sigma’s first weather sealed lens and what looks like a new design. I had the older non DG version and loved it.

    The SD1 looks pretty good… Too bad they can’t make a full frame foveon though..

  17. AP
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    It’s good to remember that Sigma likely has much less mature and able camera-tech developement teams compared to the likes of of Canon, Nikon, Olympus and Minolta (sony) Sigma is new beginner what comes to building cameras.

    That beeing said I hope them all the best. A foveon 1080p 100 mbit/s 30,25,24 fps movie fuction focused Fullframe foveon camera would be very interesting and naturally a 46-Mpix foveon (even without video) would be much interest to me as well.

  18. Ahwell
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    Shame it’s Sigma, I wish this Sensor was in Canon/Nikon’s hands.

    Pathetic AF and it will be plagued with over 9.5 million bugs at release and it will probably be released in 2062. Awesome idea, terrible implementation.

    • sflxn
      Posted September 21, 2010 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

      Agreed. I wish Nikon had snapped up Foveon. Maybe they could have fixed the Foveon color problem. Then again, it’s telling that Nikon, Canon, and Sony had little interest in them. Perhaps the problem is unsolveable. I have little faith Sigma was able to solve it.

  19. WoutK89
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

    In Holland it is already in some places completely sold out and undeliverable.

    • WoutK89
      Posted September 21, 2010 at 1:26 pm | Permalink

      Was aimed at Chris P

      • achton
        Posted September 21, 2010 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

        You are certainly BOBnl from dpreview & promoting as a geek for sigma. I really doubt that this camera is “already” sold out.
        15MP on a o.2 x larger sensor (4MP earlier) would be very very noisy above 400 iso. Why no FF ?

        not mentioning that in terms of video, it would be totally useless.
        If they’ fabricate a 1.5 4K foveon video camera, this would be a totall different story.

        • lorenzino
          Posted September 21, 2010 at 6:02 pm | Permalink

          I guess they were talking about the new 12-300 2.8 OS zoom lens…

  20. Nathan
    Posted September 21, 2010 at 2:05 pm | Permalink

    I would still like one for its nice slide film-like image quality.
    Would be nice for portraits with a 50mm F1.4.

    And at about 1500 bucks, it’s quite reasonable. Won’t replace my main SLR, just augment it.

    Hate the Sigma mount, though. Build it with a Nikon mount and I’d already have preordered.

    • Lolly
      Posted September 21, 2010 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

      It’s better if Sigma went M4/3 way and create a camera body for that standard. They’ll probably sell more cameras that way.