Nikon D800

By PR admin | Published: November 19, 2011
Pin It

I don't like double posts on my blogs, but even if you are not a Nikon fan you should check out the Nikon D800 over at NikonRumors.com:

Nikon D800 front 264x300 Nikon D800Nikon D800 back 276x300 Nikon D800

Related posts:

  1. Is it a Sony or is it a Nikon?
  2. This week: Nikon and Canon annoucements
  3. What new products to expect at the CP+ show in Japan
  4. Samyang 8mm f/3.5 IF MC Nikon F (Video Aspherical) VDSLR lens
  5. PhotoRumors Giveaway #5: Digital Holga ultimate kit for Nikon or Canon

This entry was posted in Other. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

12 Comments

  1. sade
    Posted November 19, 2011 at 9:36 pm | Permalink

    Peter! Have you heard about another version of D800 with lower mp count and better iso/dynamic range?

    • PR admin
      Posted November 19, 2011 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

      no, only about another version without the AA filter

  2. Nikky
    Posted November 19, 2011 at 9:57 pm | Permalink

    i like more compact and lighter. but i don’t really know what to do with 36 megapixels… concering iso it doesn’t hurt so much, since i de-noise and reduce in size every picture anyway. but i strongly hope dynamic range is not affected and at least as good as in d7000. and the other thing is memory. these raw files are BIG – that means a lot of money for memory cards and also my hard disk get filled too quickly, and file handling is slow. it would be nice if the processor could at least produce 12 or 18 megapixel “raw” files, which would not be raw concerning sampling of course, but at least in respect of dynamic range.

    • genotypewriter
      Posted November 20, 2011 at 8:51 am | Permalink

      that means a lot of money for memory cards and also my hard disk get filled too quickly

      That’s actually the photographer’s fault for not being careful/selective enough :)

  3. Mik
    Posted November 20, 2011 at 8:12 am | Permalink

    It’s a fake

  4. Azmir
    Posted November 20, 2011 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    Yea…whats up with that? NR Admin says its a fake? Is this a joke or what?

    • Blender
      Posted November 20, 2011 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

      Picture might be ‘doctored’ a bit, to conceal the source?
      I seriously do not think Admin would make a ‘Ladies and Gentlemen’-statement without being rather convinced himself about the outcome of this story…

    • PR admin
      Posted November 20, 2011 at 1:21 pm | Permalink

      no, this was a comment by somebody who pretended to be NR admin

      • genotypewriter
        Posted November 20, 2011 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

        And how do we know you are you? :)

        • PR admin
          Posted November 20, 2011 at 5:33 pm | Permalink

          Because I can delete comments, the other guy can’t :) His comments are gone now.

  5. Disiderio
    Posted November 20, 2011 at 6:10 pm | Permalink

    The front dial looks very suspect.

    • Warpig
      Posted November 21, 2011 at 11:48 am | Permalink

      Just peep a little in the nikonrumors post…. incredible how people can go nuts with this.