Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art lens additional coverage (sample photos, AF test, price)


Sigma has released the various performance tests/graphs for their new Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art lens on their global website. The lens looks absurdly sharp (according to Sigma, the diffraction MTF better represents real-life performance, even if almost everyone in the industry uses the geometric MTF, which tends to be sharper than reality).

Sigma has uploaded two official sample photos on their website. More sample photos and price info for the 135mm f/1.8 lens (via AP, for US pricing and pre-order options check Adorama and B&H):

"Although we’re yet to be informed of the pricing and availability of the lens, we expect it to cost around the same price as the Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art (£1,199)."

Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art Sample Image Gallery

Sigma 135mm f/1.8 AF speed test video:

The Sigma 135mm f/1.8 ART lens will also be available in a cinema versions in the future (part of their new line of cinema lenses). Sigma also mentioned that they will be making cinema zoom lenses:

Check also the latest dpreview and AP interviews with Sigma's CEO:

Dpreview: Sigma's new Art-series lenses have a degree of weather-sealing - why now?

KY: It’s based on customer demand. Some of our customers said that rain and snow sometimes got into the lens mount, so they wanted sealing. And the other reason is that it’s becoming a trend. Other manufacturers are offering sealed mounts.

AP: Sigma prides itself on producing lenses that are cheaper than its rivals. How much more challenging is this at the premium end of the market?

KY: There are two reasons why we can reach high quality standards at reasonably low price. We have a basic organization with a very small marketing team, research teams, sales teams and so overall costs are lower than some of the big companies. The second reason is our factory, which can produce very high quality parts that require high precision. If we were to buy parts from suppliers it costs a lot. We can’t release such high quality products at the same price otherwise. If we maintain our organization structure I think we can continue producing a strong product lineup.

AP: You say it’s able to resolve more than 50-million-pixels. How much more are we talking?

KY: Our statement is that the 135mm f/1.8 is usable with cameras with a 50-million-pixel resolution. With regard to the centre resolution, it outperforms 50-million-pixels.

 

 

AP: Last time we spoke you mentioned you could see DSLR and mirrorless cameras running side-by-side in the future. Do you still feel the same?

KY: I don’t think mirrorless cameras can be as good as DSLR’s for moving subjects. If you shoot fast moving subjects then DSLR still has the edge. For this segment, DSLR is very strong. Mirrorless does have its benefits though – focusing is accurate and you can get instant feedback for white balance and exposure, which remains a huge advantage over DSLR. I think the majority of interchangeable lens cameras will be mirrorless in the future, but this doesn’t mean DSLR will die.

Via NikonRumors

This entry was posted in Sigma and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
  • decentrist

    “Sigma prides itself on producing lenses that are cheaper than its rivals.” lmao!!

    • harvey

      Compare Sigma versus the camera manufacturers’ lenses – what is the price difference? 3rd party? Show me the comparable lenses?

      • decentrist

        you don’t get it

      • sickheadache

        U are grave danger of being voted off the island, at tribal council tonight!

        • decentrist

          what if I promise to kiss the golden lens dock of shame?

          • sickheadache

            Ok..This Time!

          • decentrist

            mmmm, smooch,slurp…I love you my little manual focus brick fixer…smooch, slurp…mmmm

      • Zos Xavius

        Correct.

        • Politics_Nerd

          wrong.

          • Zos Xavius

            And how is he wrong? What 3rd party manufacturers have anything close to the art line?

          • Politics_Nerd

            I was referring to the fact that the Nikon 135 f/2DC is unmatched even after being on the market for 25 years.

          • Zos Xavius

            The Nikon beats the signs optically? That’s not what dxomark says.

          • Politics_Nerd

            That’s funny that you say that since DXO has never tested the Nikon 135DC. Liar!

          • Zos Xavius

            LOL. it was a stupid comment. i was thinking about the 85 art that sigma just released. they are claiming the sigma 85/1.4 art beats the zeiss otus which costs around $4k I think these days. $1000 is more than fair and puts it in a price/performance league that not much can really match, though I bet the 135DC is lovely.

          • Zos Xavius

            Sigma I meant.

      • Politics_Nerd

        JUST bought myself a NikonUSA-refurbished 135mm F/2DC for $800 shipped from adorama. I think it’s the better lens! 🙂

        • Yasser Sultan

          It’s an ancient lens.

          • Politics_Nerd

            Classic lens, yet to be matched due to Nikon owning the patent.

          • Chris Prayua

            Definitely it is. Not recommend it.

        • Chris Prayua

          I have Nikon 135, and I hate it! The focus is just so bad. I will be selling it.

        • Banh Mi DSLR101

          135mm DC , too soft at f/2 bro… 😀 if you spend that amount of money, just grab the Samyang 135mm f2 , for $350 used, and you will throw ur nikkon 135mm to trash can.

  • abortabort

    Sigma Cine zooms are well known, announced and launched already.

  • Politics_Nerd

    JUST bought myself a NikonUSA-refurbished 135mm F/2DC for $800 from adorama. I think it’s the better lens!

    • Banh Mi DSLR101

      135mm DC , too soft at f/2 bro… 😀 if you spend that amount of money, just grab the Samyang 135mm f2 , for $350 used, and you will throw ur nikkon 135mm to trash can….

  • wow… MTF charts are basically two straightlines

  • runbei

    Sorry, but from what I see here, the Canon 135 f2 still blows it away. Who cares about sharpness in the last .0009% increment, if the Canon’s bokeh and portrait “look” are still vastly better.

  • Back to top