Canon EOS 3D

CanonRumors reports about a new model that will fit between the 5D and 1D Canon DSLRs. Rumored specs:

  • 16.7mp FF
  • 7.2 µm pixel pitch
  • DIGIC V
  • Small magnesium alloy body similar to the 5D2
  • The camera will be priced above the 5D2. Possibly in the $4000-$4500 range with the 1D Mark IV
  • Announcement for Photokina.

Related posts:

  1. Some Canon rumors
  2. Rumor: new Canon on Tuesday, October 20 (Canon 1D Mark 4)
  3. Canon Rumors
  4. Canon 5D Mark II firmware pre-announced
  5. Canon 60D rumor

This entry was posted in Canon and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

17 Comments

  1. Saiminyaku
    Posted December 29, 2009 at 10:07 am | Permalink

    I don’t think it could be priced alongside the 1D series. The 1D series will either be cheaper or more expensive in this purely hypothetical situation that a EOS 3D does make face any time in our lives. My thoughts are that it will probably be cheaper and lack the speed of the 1D series, but have a faster FPS than the 5D series has been notorious for lacking in.

  2. regular
    Posted December 29, 2009 at 10:07 am | Permalink

    too little, too late.

  3. mochapaulo
    Posted December 29, 2009 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    “The camera will be priced above the 5D2. Possibly in the $4000-$4500 range with the 1D Mark IV”

    What a shock! But why I feel that it is 1Ds mark IV rather than what so called 3D?
    The price strategy of Canon seldom collides with other segments and clearly differential. $4000 – $4500 is what exactly 1Ds mark IV may sit in.
    But it also sounds strange that how can a camera equipped with less pixel than the last generation and single image processor push to such a high price. I don’t think it is good enough to be true.

  4. deez
    Posted December 29, 2009 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Keep in mind the two rumors are combined. The CR3 source says there will be one. The Cr3 source never gives specs. The specs are from a different source, and he doesn’t specify how reliable that source is.

    • deez
      Posted December 29, 2009 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

      Oops, the Specs source is CR1. So quite unreliable information on the specs.

  5. BONETTI
    Posted December 29, 2009 at 5:56 pm | Permalink

    This makes no Sense ar all. FAKE

  6. T_life@me.com
    Posted December 29, 2009 at 6:46 pm | Permalink

    If that’s all the spec, hy would it be priced over the 5D Mark II?

  7. dude
    Posted December 29, 2009 at 11:10 pm | Permalink

    nikon, your move.

    • WoutK89
      Posted December 30, 2009 at 6:01 am | Permalink

      Rumor wise, or?

  8. Anonymous
    Posted December 29, 2009 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

    seems interesting, but the high price kinda throws it off

  9. peter
    Posted December 30, 2009 at 2:25 am | Permalink

    just buy a 5d mark II

  10. grumps
    Posted December 30, 2009 at 2:44 am | Permalink

    Wait, a FF camera with less MP than the 5D2 but costing almost twice as much. Think…

    • Posted December 30, 2009 at 4:21 am | Permalink

      sure it makes sense, is worse but more expensive

    • Sky
      Posted December 30, 2009 at 4:26 am | Permalink

      Number of megapixels doesn’t make the camera better or worse.

    • WoutK89
      Posted December 30, 2009 at 6:06 am | Permalink

      maybe it will crack some high speed AF with very high fps? A real 1Dm3 in a small body?

  11. loickeri
    Posted December 30, 2009 at 4:57 am | Permalink

    There is a real need for a 1Ds Without that stupid grip, same thing for Nikon

  12. regular
    Posted January 1, 2010 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    coming back to this thread. I wonder if the rumor about a 3D body is not triggered by the close arrival of Nikon’s D800.

    Nikon’s D700 was close to be the must-have FF camera (for experts), only lacking resolution for certain needs.
    If the D800 is 18Mpx, then Canon must hurry and provide a competitor. 5Dii’s AF module is way too bad for moving subjects or low-light photos.