Panasonic LX series remains in 2010 lineup

Panasonic still lists the LX series in their 2010 lineup:

 Panasonic LX series remains in 2010 lineup

Rumors for a Panasonic LX3 replacement has been floating around for a year, but nothing credible has been reported so far.

Via Cnet

Related posts:

  1. Two announcement from Panasonic before Photokina
  2. Panasonic LX3 replacement – not until early 2010
  3. What to expect @ PMA 2010
  4. Panasonic announced their Micro Four Thirds lens roadmap for 2010
  5. Panasonic Lumix GF3 “mini” is really tiny

This entry was posted in Panasonic and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

10 Comments

  1. NikoDoby
    Posted February 5, 2010 at 9:56 am | Permalink

    What about their GH and GF camera lines? I don’t see them listed. Does that mean they are going to stop making them in 2010? :)

    • Posted February 5, 2010 at 11:12 am | Permalink

      GF and G Series are not compact camera line.

      • NikoDoby
        Posted February 5, 2010 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

        GF series is more compact than the FZ series and besides aren’t the GH and GF still LUMIX cameras? The title of the slide says a LUMIX for everyone.

  2. Eric
    Posted February 5, 2010 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    Japanese companies really need to learn how to simplify. I’m not going to say companies need to go all Apple on their product lines and trim down to less than 4 models, but is this really necessary? I could see them making a case that one camera for each of those markets is needed, but they’ll have 3+ models in most of those sections. On top of that, it’s not like there’s a huge difference in most of those P&S cameras in the first place.

    • Global
      Posted February 5, 2010 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

      All of these companies make understanding their products too difficult. Maybe I am being American in my tailoring requests, but we just want to know some very basic things VERY quickly:

      Portraits 2-2.8F:35-105:1.6K:10
      Nickname: Panasonic Portraitshots10
      (Type, Low light, normal-tele zoom, high ISO, year)

      Events 2.8-3.5F:24-70:1.6K:10
      Nickname: Panasonic Eventshots10
      (Type, Low light, high iso, wide-normal zoom, year)

      Travel 3.5-5.6F:28-200:800:10
      Nickname: Panasonic Travelshots10
      (Type, Day light, extended tele-zoom, decent iso, year)

      And so on…….

      I don’t know why they just use made up terms instead of the ones we already know. And anyone who DOESN’T know these things isn’t usually going to do the real research anyway, so you may as well just use the use-type (“travel”) in the name plus the year so you know if its a new model or an old model (idiot/executive summary version).

      • Eric
        Posted February 5, 2010 at 9:31 pm | Permalink

        Exactly. I sometimes wonder if their marketing branches have ever read usability reports. As a web designer/software interface designer I have to read those things, and one of the key things they harp on is don’t use “made up” terms. People are always trying to reinvent the wheel and it just makes things too confusing…and then there’s Panasonic here taking it to a whole other level:

        “For day trips”
        “For family memories”
        “For travel”
        “For Parties”

        Seriously, WTF? Each camera in those subgroups pretty much does the exact same thing, they just have different styles and prices. How about this:

        Enthusiast Compact
        Super Zoom
        Stylish compact
        Weather resistant
        Entry Level

        Call them what they are and trim the product lines down a touch. Who wants to plow through that many models just to find the right one especially when they are all pretty much the same? Sheesh.

        • dyna
          Posted February 9, 2010 at 9:58 am | Permalink

          100% agreed. Companies are far too concerned with shelf space and impressions, still believing that marketshare will someday = profitability (look at Nikon hemorrhaging money year in and year out, thank god they’ve got that market share!!)…

          There are too many cloned or clone-ish cameras out there. Smart dealers pare down the lineup per manufacturer to 4-6 models and even then they have to deal with the colors in the line as well.

          Totally ridiculous.

  3. Mark
    Posted February 5, 2010 at 7:36 pm | Permalink

    Wow with all those series of cameras I will need to go back to college and get another degree just to be smart enough to keep up with all of them.

    Mark

  4. dude
    Posted February 5, 2010 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    LX4 with 1/1.6″ back illuminated cmos pls.

  5. spam
    Posted February 6, 2010 at 6:13 am | Permalink

    Horrible portrait