New Samsung sensor with global shutter

"Two CMOS sensor on the same chip. This concept apply to 12.4MPx APS-C CMOS sensor. The sensor integrates noise reduction circuits and 4 “Digital Channels”, two for each half-sensor. Each half-sensor has 6.2MPx with a speed transfer of 8.2fps through Global Shutter, whole sensor has 12.4MPx with a total transfer rate of 8.2fps.

Both half-sensor are activate and synchronized by “Synchro-shutter” device to the same exactly time and the information from both half-sensor is drained through 4 digital channels to the image processor.

This allows:
- electronic shutter (global shutter mode)
- non-mechanical shutter
- high frame per second
- less static interference (digital channels and just 2 per half-sensor)"

new samsung sensor New Samsung sensor with global shutter

globalshuttersensor New Samsung sensor with global shutter

Related posts:

  1. New CMOSIS 12MP/300fps global shutter sensor
  2. Rumor: Samsung is implementing an electronic shutter in their sensor
  3. New APS-C 14.2MP sensor from Samsung
  4. Panasonic GH2: the first shutter-less camera
  5. Samsung working on full-frame CMOS sensor for Pentax and Samsung DLSRs

This entry was posted in Samsung. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

4 Comments

  1. GlobalGuy
    Posted March 31, 2010 at 12:46 am | Permalink

    Admin –

    Would this allow for the same “high synch” rates that the D40 has that the D700/D3, for example, cannot do? This is important for flash photography in daylight, for example. A few people have pointed out something that electronic shutters can do that sheet shutters cannot easily accomplish. Does this apply?

  2. taurui
    Posted March 31, 2010 at 5:38 am | Permalink

    Unlimited sync time in a 12MP camera? Strobists rejoice! :)

  3. GlobalGuy
    Posted March 31, 2010 at 1:32 pm | Permalink

    I would just like to point out that “sequential” (“secuential activator”) is not spelled correctly, which might indicate an incomplete idea/incomplete project. Is this confirmed? If so, it might just be a translation error.

  4. Richard
    Posted March 31, 2010 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

    This combination should wind up being a little bit smaller than a “full frame” sensor and so “full frame” lenses should cover it. It is an interesting concept to increase the number of data paths (and hence potential frame rate). I wonder just what sort of cost is involved in this as compared to a full frame sensor.