And one more: full Fuji X10 specs

Update: watch out this website in the next few hours for more info on the new Fuji X10: http://fujifilm-x.com.

More Fuji X10 images from Thetagtech and complete specs from Technobuffalo:

Detailed Fuji X10 specs (also from Technobuffalo):

This entry was posted in Fuji and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.
  • MiTaka

    Ok, but why are You deleting my comments? Seems You’ve liked the pic

    • http://photorumors.com PR admin

      No, I am not deleting them! They went to the spam folder and I just approved them. Keep them coming. I also send you an email :)

  • Peter

    any info on when it’s coming out?

    Raised quite a bit of attention this little camera.

    • http://photorumors.com PR admin

      the official announcement is in few hours

  • Ben Y

    Damn, these product images are nice.

  • http://h4photos.tumblr.com Howard H

    Only 85% coverage with the optical viewfinder which is a shame; a lot of cameras (DSLRs admittedly) get criticised when they manage only 95%.

    • bob

      85% is similar to the viewfinders on the G12 and P7000/7100. It’s a glorified point and shoot, without the tactile dials from the X100. It would have been a lot better if it had the X100 aperture and shutter speed dials, similar to the old Panasonic LC1/Leica Digilux 2. Oh well, can’t have everything, and Fuji probably won’t have my money as well.

      • hjh

        I had Digilux 2. Too big body & lens. May as well been carrying a dslr + prime.
        X10 is just right.

    • MJr

      To be expected, being so tiny, and even lens-coupled zooom cranked in there ! :o
      A little rectangle slr-mirror (+prism) is nothing special in comparison ;)

    • Frog

      The 85% is probably what they wanted to do. This is to make up for parallax error that would cut off peoples heads off (in the picture). This is a very common problem with rangefinder type cameras when used by the uninitiated.

  • Ke

    Looks to be a decent size.

  • sig sig

    sexy beast is this camera

    • MJr

      so sexy that we’re only allowed to hold one if you look like this guy in the ad :D

  • Robert Daniels

    Ohh this is what I’ve been waiting for. I wanted an interchangeable lens camera like Leica but don’t have the $ for that. but this little gem looks impressive. we will see what Nikon has up its sleeve by the end of the next month. But somebody is going to try to get a nice Christmas present this year.

  • http://www.briandougher.com Brian

    I would buy this even if it didn’t take pictures.

    • grayscale

      Yeah, it is definitely a work of art!

  • grayscale

    This camera will be wicked for snapping shots when you don’t want to lug your SLR around. I can’t believe it does 200fps. I wonder at what resolution.
    I will probably grab one of these, If the lens is decent with those F values it will be super versatile.

    How was the X100 lens?

    They even managed to fit a zooming viewfinder in there.. I actually don’t mind it’s only 85% coverage. Just gives me room for crops.

    • newoldmate

      200fps?

      • MJr

        Yes high speed movie at lower res, like some more compacts do. Nice feature to play with, but expect very crappy resolution.

        Look in the specs under -Photography Functions-

        High Speed Movie (70/120/200 fps)

        the canon ixus 220 for example (240fps):
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_XZf2P1hPs

        • L E

          Yeah i know, I’m just surprised how its features like this that gets peoples attention. This coupled with “face detection: yes” and “image stabilizer: lens shift type”, and there will be calls of “camera of the year!” soon.

          • newoldmate

            whoops, L E = newoldmate

  • Camaman

    SO one question?
    What will you see in the OVF when you zoom the lens in and out?
    Will the OVF display the frame about to be taken??

  • bla blahblah

    looks nice. tiny sensor. overpriced.

  • http://www.harold-glit.com Harold GLIT

    Ah if only Fuji has not chosen to opt for a 3;2 viewing ratio on a camera that has a native sensor ratio of 4: 3 ( 2/3 sensors has a 4′;3 viewing ratio) ..

    what an odd choice

    Harold

    • newoldmate

      Not sure i follow you there.
      Viewing ratio?

      • http://www.harold-glit.com Harold GLIT

        meaning that when you look in the OVF it is a 3;2 ratio
        and that the LCD is a 3;2 ratio and as far as I know may be the only one
        this is rather silly since a 2/3 sensor has a native image ratio of 4/3

        Harold

  • farlymac

    Thanks for the PASSWORD PROTECTED link http://fujifilm-x.com/.

    • http://photorumors.com PR admin

      I said watch it in the next few hours

  • photodog

    Has anyone looked at the fujifilmusa.com website?
    They list a “Finepix XP20″ and “XP30″
    Maybe two separate cameras tomorrow.

    • http://photorumors.com PR admin

      those are XP20 and XP30 – different models

  • photodog

    Sorry, just shown with an X10 photo above.

  • A.A.

    Looks like the battery used in the X10 is the NP-50 (also used by the F550EXR ). Will be interesting to see what the IQ of the X10 will be.

  • Back to top